View Single Post
Old 07-03-08, 11:43 PM   #192 (permalink)
Marilyn Monroe
Educator

 
Marilyn Monroe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Last Online: Today 07:47 PM
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,117
Thanks: 248
Thanked 129 Times in 108 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Female

Current Mood:
Sneaky
Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
People are not heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, or any other abstract classification, we are merely sexual. Orientation is not absolute or inalterable. It is a ethereal concept that can change and change back. There is nothing wrong with this. Why are you so opposed to the idea? Is it because you don't want to admit you might be wrong or because of your agenda? Or both?
Most people are sexual and can swing any way they want if they are willing to get icked out, or try to enjoy it, but we all have preferences we are born with. This is where our orientation comes from. There are too many heterosexuals for their sexuality not to be an orientation, and there are also quite a few homosexuals which says to me they are swinging the way they prefer, they aren't swinging just to swing, they are doing what comes naturally.

You're saying it's all a choice. Having sex is a choice, but who you are attracted to is different. You're attracted to what you're attracted to. We can have sex many ways if we are inclined to do so, but most of us can't be truly attracted to just anybody.

Quote:
This is getting old. Your entire argument operates under the assumption that, a: orientation is real and tangible and not some ethereal concept, and, b: that it has been proven to be inalterable. Neither of these assumptions are true, so your entire argument is moot.
It is true, you just don't want to admit it.
__________________
"It's not that I'm afraid to die, I just don't want to be there when it happens." Woody Allen.
Marilyn Monroe is offline   Reply With Quote