Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Detector  the Iraqi people have elected a government, |
One that is weak and can't support itself or grow the balls to fight for it's own land. Expecting American soldiers to do what Arabs seem to be too retarded to do.
Quote:
|
rid themselves of a murderous dictator who caused the death of millions of his own people not to mention the millions of his neighbors from two unnecessary wars, they are enforcing their laws, violence is at an all time low and the terrorists are on the run.
|
THEY rid themselves of a murderous dictator? Who is THEY? Last time I checked it was U.S. helicopters, tanks and soldiers going through the streets of Baghdad fighting Iraqi troops. It was U.S. troops that were looking for
Saddam.
Quote:
|
But of course in your definition, it would have been a much better political solution to ignore the threat Saddam continued to pose, to ignore his outright defiance of continuous UN resolutions and to ignore the corruption of the UN oil-for-food program.
|
It's been proven that Saddam posed about as much a threat as Mugabe. The only reason his country was still around was because oil is good money. That's not the reason we went to war but can you show what made Saddam a threat to the U.S.? His non-existent WMDs? Or was it the war he couldn't start because he was being kept in check by other Arab nations?
Quote:
Once again, failure as defined by you and the corrupt intellectually weak blather from the Left in this country is this; because you say so.
Carry on.
|
Failure is defined by the fact 'we' can't leave until 'we' fix what the Iraqis won't do fix for themselves. Like children they have to have everything done for them. That Iraqis won't step up to the plate and take off their uniforms the second they're hit with anything stronger then a 9MM is a sign of how big a failure this war has been.