Quote:
Originally Posted by Goobieman  The issue is what -firearms- are protected, as was put forth in the OP.
This was on purpose, to exclude unnecessary and meaningless dicussion regarding the individual posession of nuclear weapons. |
Not meaningless at all. While IMO it would be hard to argue that "nukes" are arms, it is not meaningless to suggests that "arms" may be broader than "firearms".
If the goal is the debate what the 2dA permits folks to bear, why arbitrarily limit the discussion?
Why aren't hand gernades "arms" for example? A person can certainly be armed with hand gernades.