So I see once again you've chosen not to present an explanation as to why said distinction was in any way, shape, or form significant to the topic of discussion. I wonder why...
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfuh  I say again, the science says only of the properties of energy - none of which call energy god. God is your claim - the burden of proof rests with you. |
And what is God? I have presented my definition derived from the Christian bible where God is that which is in and of all things and which all things are in and of, which by Einstein's insight that all matter is convertible into energy fits said description. I have stated this many times, and so either you've got a problem reading or a problem understanding if you are forced to continually ask questions which have already been answered.
Quote:
|
You've done absolutely nothing of the sort, all you've done is gone around and around in circles with a conclusion that says "look I did it I proved that energy is god".
|
You know, that's exactly what I did, I just went around in circles with a conclusion that says "look I did it I proved that energy is god". What an astute observation.
Quote:
|
YOU just stated that you've proved that god is energy and that this is the christian god that is written in the bible - all your statements shesh, have the ****ing balls to admit what you've already stated it's utterly rediculous of you here trying to dodge it.
|
As I've defined God I've shown energy is God, so either you can challenge the definition of energy or the definition of God. You've chosen to do neither and to instead whine and insult me while contributing absolutely nothing of merit to this conversation. And if that's the best you can do, well, at least you tried.
Quote:
|
You put your views onto the topic of this site. You put your views here and said that your christian god exists and is synonymous with what scientists have stated is the energy in the Universe and insist this as proof of the existence of your god; has this ceased being a debate site and become the site of galenrox personal **** views?. Please, drop the feigned outrage hurt dove routine.
|
Oh wow, you really got me here
So let's once again go through what you've asserted as a supposedly relevant argument - that you are in a position to tell me what I believe against my statements to the contrary because I'm able to make statements about science, and to suggest otherwise is to undermine this forum. Pretty flawless logic there!
Quote:
|
Do you even know what a negative argument is?
|
Yes, do you?
Quote:
|
You explained it only in one that is not supported by any factual evidence and proclaim it to be proof. Now you're feigning outrage when you're met with challenges on it. Look dude, you don't want people challenging on your views, don't post it. The obvious flaw of your logic is that you've not in anyway established that energy is god - in particular with the fact that you've simultaneously also stated that energy is just that, nothing more nothing less; but here you are assigning divinity to energy?
|
Right, because pages and pages of answering every argument presented against me is really indicative of my fear of having my views challenged! You found me out! I only present counterpoints out of a secret rage that anyone would have the gall to challenge my positions, and it has absolutely nothing to do with your arguments consisting of nothing other than nonsense and insults!
Define divinity.
Quote:
|
Further evidence you do not know what you are talking about. Though the letters representative of hydrogen and oxygen remain the same, however hydrogen that is covalently bound to oxygen is far from being the same as it's elemental form. To allow you to better understand this look at iron vs rusted iron - it's not in anyway the same.
|
So you admit that this is an ad hominem string of argumentation?
Quote:
|
The entirety was given to show you of the variation between the different energies. Mechanical energy is not the same as chemical energy and so on.
|
It is, just in a different form as a product of environmental features (evidenced by the ability of conversion).
I could throw in a string of insults to if it would help hammer this **** through your ****ing skull, but I've had discussions with you before and so I'm fully aware of your tenuous (at best) relationship with any form of logic or argumentation that nothing could hammer it into your skull.