• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Is the Israeli Leadership Straying from the Peace Path?

Owned by a post which contained no references or substance whatsoever...:roll:
Not I see why you are so bad at debating.

I have asked The Face Of Jacob to substantiate his claims.....so far we are still waiting as he has posted nothing...is he just full of soundbites too?

And I am here to debate the politics and validity of the claims - it is the substance of the post which I am interested in, not the posters religion as it makes no difference to me.

I understand that as a religious extremist you will find that concept hard to fathom.


Two people with an IQ have told you that you are WRONG. Accept this and get over the fact that you've been OWNED!

You are DEFEATED!!!!

An ISRAELI citizen OWNED your ass!

Give it up ....
 
Two people with an IQ have told you that you are WRONG. Accept this and get over the fact that you've been OWNED!

You are DEFEATED!!!!

An ISRAELI citizen OWNED your ass!

Give it up ....

Um, your owned.

Look, you got just owned above!

Is this how it works in the extremist debating society?

Now why don't you cut the soundbites and substatiate any of the posts if you can.

Or have you given up now you have been forced to quit on the lies and resort to proper debating? :roll:
 
Um, your owned.

Look, you got just owned above!

Is this how it works in the extremist debating society?

Now why don't you cut the soundbites and substatiate any of the posts if you can.

Or have you given up now you have been forced to quit on the lies and resort to proper debating? :roll:

As many people have told you ... I didn't lie. You're wrong and you lack the ball-balls to admit it. This much is certain. You are now behaving like an angry 2 year-old.

You're beaten ... and you need to learn to accept it.

In fact, you were beaten not once, but TWICE ... on the same subject. Therefore, you must seek to accept your loss gracefully and move on (we all know this something that you are not capable of doing).

:mrgreen:
 
Maybe he turns out to be a gift to Macabee Netanya, he was good in Hungary, but they had some bad luck :mrgreen:
He was good also in Salzburg but they sacked him. Half a year ago I read a very nice article about the fans of Casino who didn't want the take over of Red Bull on their team so they established the Casino club in the lower league. An Israeli reporter was sent to talk with the coach and with the management of this club in Salzburg and he also saw one of their games.

But in the last days it seems that he doesn't want to come to Netanya (although he declared that he may want to settle down in Israel) because he may be wanted in Spanish clubs, it's written in the media that he doesn't answer phones from Netanya although they in the club deny that. The one who signed Matthäus was the German-Jewish owner of Netanya whom I gave you a video interview with him about 18 months ago.

My last name is of Hebrew origin, too.
Nice.

Yes, I like Yiddish Klezmer music. We have a band here by the name "Aufwind", they have a real funny song called "Wat ken ju mach, s'is Amerike", but I only have it on record. There are some of their songs in the internet, at least parts of the songs, but not this song.

AUFWIND - Jiddish Songs and Klezmermusic
Thanks, I'll check this out soon.
 
He was good also in Salzburg but they sacked him. Half a year ago I read a very nice article about the fans of Casino who didn't want the take over of Red Bull on their team so they established the Casino club in the lower league. An Israeli reporter was sent to talk with the coach and with the management of this club in Salzburg and he also saw one of their games.

But in the last days it seems that he doesn't want to come to Netanya (although he declared that he may want to settle down in Israel) because he may be wanted in Spanish clubs, it's written in the media that he doesn't answer phones from Netanya although they in the club deny that. The one who signed Matthäus was the German-Jewish owner of Netanya whom I gave you a video interview with him about 18 months ago.
Yes, I remember this video. The trainer of our local team, which is Dynamo Dresden, had to go these days, even though he still has a contract and they met all their targets. Eduard Geyer is a local and he has a lot of experience. Now they have to pay his contract and they look for another trainer, more a talent, who they don't have to pay so much.

I think, I have been in Netanya before, this was when we visited Caesarea Maritima.
 
And you can back this statement up with what quotes from the posts on this thread? We are waiting...........

Re: lieing and false propoganda then here is why I believe Vader is lying and spreading false zionist propoganda :-

1) He claimed in no uncertain terms that God gave the land to the Jews and that they were the original inhabitants. Lie number one has been debunked - even Vader himself has had to admit defeat. Only after Tashah enlightened him though.
Regarding the Jews been the original inhabitants it's not a lie because the Jews were among the original inhabitants and I said it in one of my posts in the past.

The original inhabitants were the Canaanites who were descendants of Canaan. Canaan was one of Noach's descendants and after the building of the tower of Babel G-d scattered all the descendants of Noach all over the world and Canaan (the man) went to a place which he called Canaan and settled in it.

But the Canaanites weren't a homogeneous nation! The Canaanites were many nations and we also know their names. And here I'm reaching to the point: Also the fathers of the Jewish nation Abraham, Jacob, Isaac and their families were living in Canaan and they had property there!

Jacob (who was called Israel and he is the father of the children of Israel/Jews) went down to Egypt with his 12 sons of Israel (Jacob's family counted 70 family members) because there was hunger in Canaan and after 400 years his family came back to its homeland!

G-d planned from the start to give the land to the Jews. G-d said (hundreds of years before the Exodus) to Abraham (who was living in Canaan) that the land will belong to the Jews.

2) He claimed Jerusalem meant 'Temple of the jews' and its name was good proof of its 'ownership'. This lie has also been debunked.
I wouldn't call it "a lie". Vader isn't a liar. Liar is a bad man and Vader isn't a bad man. He is a good man, and I'm not saying that because he supports Israel, there are things he says that I don't agree with him but I know him and I know his honesty and manners and I also know his many posts which are very true, so don't be petty!

I would say that he was mistaken maybe by a website he was reading or maybe by someone who told him that.

But the truth is that he had a point because among the 70 names of Jerusalem there's "Temple"!

3) He proclaimed Kind David as the founder of Jerusalem despite knowing this be incorrect (he has read the bible, so he says) - this lie had also been debunked.
It's not a lie, indeed King David was the founder of Jerusalem. When he conquered Jerusalem (as G-d commanded) it wasn't called Jerusalem But Yevus and the residents of this place weren't called Jerusalemites but Yevusim. King David made Jerusalem to what it is.

After commenting that peace negotiations were desired Israel has recently announced plans to build even more settlements in occupied Jerusalem. Despite protests from the US and the UN, Israel has decided that its expansion and settlement plans should take priority over any peace negotiations. Also, as stopping the settlement expansion is a necessary requirement under the Road Map, Israel has completely blown any chance of it being adhered to by the Palestinians going forward.

Why is it that whilst Israel may speak of peace its actions never match these words? Will it really not cease its expansion for peace?

Israel under fire over settlement plans - CNN.com
Francois Triffo said about self-righteous persons like you that they love humanity to such an extent that they hate people. And the people you hate are the Jews.

We (nor you) don't count the flats that the Arabs are building in the 20 countries which they occupied when they got out of Saudi Arabia so you nor your Arab friends should be counting the flats that we build for Jews in our small capital.

Jerusalem is the ETERNAL capital of the Jewish nation since thousands of years now, since the days the Arabs weren't nothing but barbaric primitive savage tribes in Saudi Arabia. Truth is that they haven't changed that much since.

Millions of Millions of Arabs had the right to get out of Saudi Arabia and to occupy 20 countries which weren't belong to them and to turn them into Arab countries? And when couple of millions of Jews are returning to their homeland you call them settlers? Haven't you got the slightest shame?

You better read this article:

Why and When was the Myth of al-Aqsa Created?

And watch this video:

[youtube]VHpMhAzj-Tk[/youtube]
 
Last edited:
יְרוּשָׁלַיִם = ye-roo-shah-LAH-yeem = Yerushalayim = Jerusalem

The name Jerusalem (pronounced as above in Hebrew) is a combination of two words. The first is "yeru" meaning "flow". This word has several applications such as the flowing of water in a river, the throwing of something as being flowed out of the hand, or as the flowing of a finger in the sense of pointing out the way one should go.
I think that The Biblical Hebrew Magazine is wrong about what I marked.

Yeru doesn't mean "flow", not in Hebrew. I know that "flow" in Hebrew is Zrima, Zerem, Shetef (mainly of water). I don't understand the connection between Yeru and Zrima. Could there be another meaning of "flow"? I saw that you used the word "flow" in sentences that aren't familiar to me (flowed out of the hand/flowing a finger). What I know is that "flow" are the Hebrew words I mentioned above but English isn't my mother language so I may not understand the full meaning of the word.

Yaru is the past plural declension of the word "they shot"/"they threw" (but Yaru is much more common regarding shooting rather than throwing) although in this word it's Yeru and not Yaru, I don't know why, maybe some kind of a deflection. It's taken from the root I.R.H. That root indeed have couple of meanings as you can read below.

From Israeli wikipedia (Jerusalem): "The word Yeru is taken from the semite root I.R.H which means "He established" (and also in Hebrew: O mee yara even pinata - book of Job 38:6)"

yisedzv4.jpg


In Job Chapter 38:6 it's written: "O mee yara even pinata":

evenfj2.jpg


The translation is: Or who shot/threw her (of the city, cause city is feminine in Hebrew) cornerstone.

I.R.H is also the root of Yoreh which is the future deflection of "He will instruct", "He will command", "He will order"; "He will indicate", "He will point out".

Yoru is "They will instruct".

In our situation it means "He established".

The "shalayim" is from the word shalam meaning complete and whole (the word Shalom is also derived from shalam, while it is usually translated as peace it more means to be complete or whole). When these two words are put together they mean something like "pointing the way to completeness".
"Completeness" is one of the 70 names of Jerusalem.

The correct word is Shalem. Shalem is indeed "complete" and "whole". But Shalem in here is according the researchers the name of an idol from the local pantheon and that place was probably called after that idol. In Genesis there's a mention of Malkitzedek Melech Shalem (Malkitzedek King of Shalem). Researchers assume that there was a temple for that idol in that place.

So it means a place established by Shalem. That is according the researchers. It should be said that Yeru is in plural, maybe because they treated Shalem in plural, also we sometimes call G-d in plural. The correct word should be Yaru, maybe it's some kind of a deflection.

The fact that Shalem is a name of an idol and also "complete" in the Hebrew language doesn't say that the meaning of this name of idol in Hebrew is "complete". In the same way that the Hebrew word "He" and the English word "He" have different meanings although they have the same sound. "He" in Hebrew is "She" in English. And "He" in English is "Hoo" in Hebrew.

There was also a Canaanite idol called Ba'al. Ba'al is "Owner" in Hebrew but the translation of the name of that idol Ba'al to Hebrew is "Master" and not "Owner".

But Yerushalem isn't Yerushalayim. What about the YI?

After G-d send the ram so Abraham could sacrifice it instead of Isaac then Abraham called the place: IHVH (G-d) Yir'eh which is: "G-d will see".

and then the sentence continues: "that he will say today it/(he?) will be seen in the mountain of G-d".

So Israeli Wikipedia says that according to the Midrash the name Yerushalayim is a combination of the words Shalem (the old name of that city based on the idol "Shalem") and the words Har IHVH Yira'eh which is: Mountain of G-d will be seen. Which means that the aspect of the "See" and "G-d" were added to the word. That is according to the Midrash.

Yir'eh (he will see)/Yira'eh (it/he will be seen) and Yeru are 2 different words which belong to different roots and they have different meanings. Yir'eh is coming from the root R.A.H (see) and Yeru is coming from the root I.R.H. (shoot/throw).

In the Tanach, the name of that city (apart from 5 places) is written without the I, like this: Yerushalem, what probably indicates on the ancient calling of that city: Yerushalem (like its name in Aramic). But even when we see that name in the Tanach: "Yerushalem", we call it: Yerushalayim.

In 5 places in the Tanach the name of the city is written in full mode, with the I, like this: Yerushalayim which probably refers to the city in later times when its name was changed.

Our sages of blessed memory also called the place Yerushalayim.
 
Yes, I remember this video. The trainer of our local team, which is Dynamo Dresden, had to go these days, even though he still has a contract and they met all their targets. Eduard Geyer is a local and he has a lot of experience. Now they have to pay his contract and they look for another trainer, more a talent, who they don't have to pay so much.
Tell them to take an Israeli coach, he won't coast much and will supply the targets. Couple of Israeli football coaches started to coach outside Israel in the recent years in Cyprus, England, South Africa, Greece (coach Yitzchak Shum won the double!!! with Panathinaikos 4 years ago)

Israeli Basketball coaches are coaching in Holland, Russia, Poland and they won titles there. Only 2 weeks ago Israeli coach Arik Shivek won the championship (for the 3rd time) with a Dutch basketball club. One year ago coach David Blatt won the European championship with Russia.

About 25 years ago an Israeli named Ralph Klein coached the German national basketball team.

I think, I have been in Netanya before, this was when we visited Caesarea Maritima.
I didn't know that. I hope you liked it here and I hope that you will come for next visits. I heard about a phenomenon of German studens who are coming to learn in universities here and of course there are those who are coming for volunteering.
 
Atah tzodek, as Ivrit is your mother tongue. For me, Anglit is my mother tongue and Hebrew is my second language. As in most such cases, people learn to speak (vocalize) a second language far faster than they learn to read and write it. Rav todot Ya'acov... Tashah bat Tziyon.
 
Regarding the Jews been the original inhabitants it's not a lie because the Jews were among the original inhabitants and I said it in one of my posts in the past.

No, the original inhabitants were the Canaanites who were a different people to the Jews. The Canaanites lived there and then the Jews came and mixed with them - this is an entirely different scenario to that which you suggest above.

"The Canaanites, with whom the Israelites came into contact during the conquest by Joshua and the period of the Judges, were a sophisticated agricultural and urban people. The name Canaan means "Land of Purple" (a purple dye was extracted from a murex shellfish found near the shores of Palestine). The Canaanites, a people who absorbed and assimilated the features of many cultures of the ancient Near East for at least 500 years before the Israelites entered their area of control, "

Canaanite culture and religion

The original inhabitants were the Canaanites who were descendants of Canaan.

Which I what I said and what Vader said was not the case - I will accept that as a concession on point 1.

But the Canaanites weren't a homogeneous nation! The Canaanites were many nations and we also know their names. And here I'm reaching to the point: Also the fathers of the Jewish nation Abraham, Jacob, Isaac and their families were living in Canaan and they had property there!

People can buy property anywhere they want - the act of buying a property does not them mean that the property now belongs to the country of the buyer. Rather the property remains part of the same country but you have the right of ownership on it - I would have thought that was obvious.

G-d planned from the start to give the land to the Jews. G-d said (hundreds of years before the Exodus) to Abraham (who was living in Canaan) that the land will belong to the Jews.

Gods intentions (if there is one) cannot be substantiated by unproveable allegations that God told someone something. Gods actions (if there is one) was to put the Canaanites on the land - surely that would be the only true example of gods wishes as to who should live there. Anything which alters this situation is strictly man made and not gods intentions.

Originally Posted by G-Man
2) He claimed Jerusalem meant 'Temple of the jews' and its name was good proof of its 'ownership'. This lie has also been debunked

I wouldn't call it "a lie". Vader isn't a liar. Liar is a bad man and Vader isn't a bad man. He is a good man, and I'm not saying that because he supports Israel, there are things he says that I don't agree with him but I know him and I know his honesty and manners and I also know his many posts which are very true, so don't be petty!

Its not petty, he posted a falsehood and I corrected him. As for his manners do you find his posts suitable for reasoned debate or just religious hatred?

I would say that he was mistaken maybe by a website he was reading or maybe by someone who told him that.

I googled and asked for a translation - couldn't find any site which provided what he offered up. Simply put, if you do not know what it means (or cannot provide any reference as proof) then do not post a translation which you say is genuine. As I don't believe he took a guess (as he admitted he lacks the ability to translate the word) then we are forced to take it as a lie.

Anyway, to the point I see that you agree that I was right and the name does not indeed mean that which Vader posted.

Point number 2 conceded.

But the truth is that he had a point because among the 70 names of Jerusalem there's "Temple"!

Its not the temple (city) bit that is the problem - its the false posting of the second part which demands correction.

Originally Posted by G-Man
3) He proclaimed Kind David as the founder of Jerusalem despite knowing this be incorrect (he has read the bible, so he says) - this lie had also been debunked.


It's not a lie, indeed King David was the founder of Jerusalem.

When he conquered Jerusalem (as G-d commanded) it wasn't called Jerusalem But Yevus and the residents of this place weren't called Jerusalemites but Yevusim. King David made Jerusalem to what it is.

You do not 'found' somewhere by simply changing the name. The suggestion that 'Jerusalem' did not exist until it was created by King David is completely false. As you acknowledge above, he conquered the city and changed its name. This would perhaps make him the 'conqueror of Jerusalem' but certainly not 'the founder of Jerusalem'. There is a huge difference.

To explain, if he was the founder then you could argue that Jerusalem was established by the Jews and should be part of their homeland.

However, the truth of the matter is that they did not establish the city of Jerusalem (as it is now called) and if you want to give it back to the original inhabitants that would not be the Jews.

Point number 3 substantiated.

Francois Triffo said about self-righteous persons like you that they love humanity to such an extent that they hate people. And the people you hate are the Jews.

I am arguing a land dispute - it is 'your side' who seek to turn this into some sort of religious debate. However, this is necessary for you as the only claim you can make is based on religious grounds - not legal or factual.

Can you provide non-religious reasons as to why this land should be owned by Israel?

We (nor you) don't count the flats that the Arabs are building in the 20 countries which they occupied when they got out of Saudi Arabia so you nor your Arab friends should be counting the flats that we build for Jews in our small capital.

If the land has not been determined to be part of Israel then you have no right to build there, its that simple. Even Israel's biggest backer accepts this.

Jerusalem is the ETERNAL capital of the Jewish nation since thousands of years now, since the days the Arabs weren't nothing but barbaric primitive savage tribes in Saudi Arabia. Truth is that they haven't changed that much since.

Well......you ALMOST got through a post without typing some religious hate speech...maybe next time you can make it the whole way.

Millions of Millions of Arabs had the right to get out of Saudi Arabia and to occupy 20 countries which weren't belong to them and to turn them into Arab countries?

Which Arab countries do you think do not belong to the Arabs?

And when couple of millions of Jews are returning to their homeland you call them settlers? Haven't you got the slightest shame?

If you have never seen the ME, if your father has never seen it, nor his father, nor his fathers father, nor his fathers fathers father, nor his fathers fathers fathers father nor any member of your family for hundreds and hundreds of years then I do not believe a place thousands of miles away from where you live is your 'homeland' no. Certainly not when the land that you claim is already occupied and has been so for hundreds of years.

The shame is that these millions of people thought it was 'right' to take the land which belonged to another. Aren't religions supposed to caring and loving and peacefull?


The title is 'Jewishmag' - if you want me to read a soure then fine. I have no problem with reading what others put up but ONLY if the source can be deemed to be independent. There is no way you can seriously expect someone to accept that as an unbiased source. Find a different source and post it and I will read it.

And watch this video:

[youtube]VHpMhAzj-Tk[/youtube]
[/QUOTE]

I have enough dealing with one extremist in Vader let alone another :rofl

Can you guys source anything which has sound reasoned arguments?
 
No, the original inhabitants were the Canaanites who were a different people to the Jews. The Canaanites lived there and then the Jews came and mixed with them - this is an entirely different scenario to that which you suggest above.

"The Canaanites, with whom the Israelites came into contact during the conquest by Joshua and the period of the Judges, were a sophisticated agricultural and urban people. The name Canaan means "Land of Purple" (a purple dye was extracted from a murex shellfish found near the shores of Palestine). The Canaanites, a people who absorbed and assimilated the features of many cultures of the ancient Near East for at least 500 years before the Israelites entered their area of control, "

Canaanite culture and religion



Which I what I said and what Vader said was not the case - I will accept that as a concession on point 1.



People can buy property anywhere they want - the act of buying a property does not them mean that the property now belongs to the country of the buyer. Rather the property remains part of the same country but you have the right of ownership on it - I would have thought that was obvious.



Gods intentions (if there is one) cannot be substantiated by unproveable allegations that God told someone something. Gods actions (if there is one) was to put the Canaanites on the land - surely that would be the only true example of gods wishes as to who should live there. Anything which alters this situation is strictly man made and not gods intentions.





Its not petty, he posted a falsehood and I corrected him. As for his manners do you find his posts suitable for reasoned debate or just religious hatred?



I googled and asked for a translation - couldn't find any site which provided what he offered up. Simply put, if you do not know what it means (or cannot provide any reference as proof) then do not post a translation which you say is genuine. As I don't believe he took a guess (as he admitted he lacks the ability to translate the word) then we are forced to take it as a lie.

Anyway, to the point I see that you agree that I was right and the name does not indeed mean that which Vader posted.

Point number 2 conceded.



Its not the temple (city) bit that is the problem - its the false posting of the second part which demands correction.








You do not 'found' somewhere by simply changing the name. The suggestion that 'Jerusalem' did not exist until it was created by King David is completely false. As you acknowledge above, he conquered the city and changed its name. This would perhaps make him the 'conqueror of Jerusalem' but certainly not 'the founder of Jerusalem'. There is a huge difference.

To explain, if he was the founder then you could argue that Jerusalem was established by the Jews and should be part of their homeland.

However, the truth of the matter is that they did not establish the city of Jerusalem (as it is now called) and if you want to give it back to the original inhabitants that would not be the Jews.

Point number 3 substantiated.



I am arguing a land dispute - it is 'your side' who seek to turn this into some sort of religious debate. However, this is necessary for you as the only claim you can make is based on religious grounds - not legal or factual.

Can you provide non-religious reasons as to why this land should be owned by Israel?



If the land has not been determined to be part of Israel then you have no right to build there, its that simple. Even Israel's biggest backer accepts this.



Well......you ALMOST got through a post without typing some religious hate speech...maybe next time you can make it the whole way.



Which Arab countries do you think do not belong to the Arabs?



If you have never seen the ME, if your father has never seen it, nor his father, nor his fathers father, nor his fathers fathers father, nor his fathers fathers fathers father nor any member of your family for hundreds and hundreds of years then I do not believe a place thousands of miles away from where you live is your 'homeland' no. Certainly not when the land that you claim is already occupied and has been so for hundreds of years.

The shame is that these millions of people thought it was 'right' to take the land which belonged to another. Aren't religions supposed to caring and loving and peacefull?



The title is 'Jewishmag' - if you want me to read a soure then fine. I have no problem with reading what others put up but ONLY if the source can be deemed to be independent. There is no way you can seriously expect someone to accept that as an unbiased source. Find a different source and post it and I will read it.

I have enough dealing with one extremist in Vader let alone another :rofl

Can you guys source anything which has sound reasoned arguments?[/quote]


You have been defeated at least 5 times now.... so why don't you just accept that you're defeated.

Thanks to Jacob for the AWESOME assist!

You got rolled like a joint and smoked, G-MAN.

:mrgreen:
 
Regarding the Jews been the original inhabitants it's not a lie because the Jews were among the original inhabitants and I said it in one of my posts in the past.

The original inhabitants were the Canaanites who were descendants of Canaan. Canaan was one of Noach's descendants and after the building of the tower of Babel G-d scattered all the descendants of Noach all over the world and Canaan (the man) went to a place which he called Canaan and settled in it.

But the Canaanites weren't a homogeneous nation! The Canaanites were many nations and we also know their names. And here I'm reaching to the point: Also the fathers of the Jewish nation Abraham, Jacob, Isaac and their families were living in Canaan and they had property there!

Jacob (who was called Israel and he is the father of the children of Israel/Jews) went down to Egypt with his 12 sons of Israel (Jacob's family counted 70 family members) because there was hunger in Canaan and after 400 years his family came back to its homeland!

G-d planned from the start to give the land to the Jews. G-d said (hundreds of years before the Exodus) to Abraham (who was living in Canaan) that the land will belong to the Jews.


I wouldn't call it "a lie". Vader isn't a liar. Liar is a bad man and Vader isn't a bad man. He is a good man, and I'm not saying that because he supports Israel, there are things he says that I don't agree with him but I know him and I know his honesty and manners and I also know his many posts which are very true, so don't be petty!

I would say that he was mistaken maybe by a website he was reading or maybe by someone who told him that.

But the truth is that he had a point because among the 70 names of Jerusalem there's "Temple"!


It's not a lie, indeed King David was the founder of Jerusalem. When he conquered Jerusalem (as G-d commanded) it wasn't called Jerusalem But Yevus and the residents of this place weren't called Jerusalemites but Yevusim. King David made Jerusalem to what it is.


Francois Triffo said about self-righteous persons like you that they love humanity to such an extent that they hate people. And the people you hate are the Jews.

We (nor you) don't count the flats that the Arabs are building in the 20 countries which they occupied when they got out of Saudi Arabia so you nor your Arab friends should be counting the flats that we build for Jews in our small capital.

Jerusalem is the ETERNAL capital of the Jewish nation since thousands of years now, since the days the Arabs weren't nothing but barbaric primitive savage tribes in Saudi Arabia. Truth is that they haven't changed that much since.

Millions of Millions of Arabs had the right to get out of Saudi Arabia and to occupy 20 countries which weren't belong to them and to turn them into Arab countries? And when couple of millions of Jews are returning to their homeland you call them settlers? Haven't you got the slightest shame?

You better read this article:

Why and When was the Myth of al-Aqsa Created?

And watch this video:

[youtube]VHpMhAzj-Tk[/youtube]


Thank you for settling this argument, Jacob. Also ... thank you for helping me figure out where I was mistaken.

Shalom!

:mrgreen:
 
You have been defeated at least 5 times now.... so why don't you just accept that you're defeated.

Thanks to Jacob for the AWESOME assist!

You got rolled like a joint and smoked, G-MAN.

:mrgreen:


This is your comeback??!! :rofl

I also would like to thank Jacob for conceding all the points that I raised and indeed confirming that your posts were lies and false propaganda. Nice to see someone on the 'other side' backing up the true history.

Vader - owned again. :2wave:
 
Tell them to take an Israeli coach, he won't coast much and will supply the targets. Couple of Israeli football coaches started to coach outside Israel in the recent years in Cyprus, England, South Africa, Greece (coach Yitzchak Shum won the double!!! with Panathinaikos 4 years ago)

Israeli Basketball coaches are coaching in Holland, Russia, Poland and they won titles there. Only 2 weeks ago Israeli coach Arik Shivek won the championship (for the 3rd time) with a Dutch basketball club. One year ago coach David Blatt won the European championship with Russia.

About 25 years ago an Israeli named Ralph Klein coached the German national basketball team.
To hire an Israeli coach would be a good idea then.


I didn't know that. I hope you liked it here and I hope that you will come for next visits. I heard about a phenomenon of German studens who are coming to learn in universities here and of course there are those who are coming for volunteering.
I liked it a lot. We were going to see Haifa Technion and we saw signs with "University written" on it. We had no idea that there is more than one University in Haifa. So the one we looked at was actually Haifa University, not Haifa Technion. But it was in a nice part of a beautiful city and you there was a phantastic look at the sea and the harbour from there.

We came from Tel Aviv, went to Jaffa, then to the north, to Haifa and Akko, then to Tiberias, to the south, Beer Sheba, Mitzpe Ramon and Eilat, down to the Sinai peninsula, than to the north again to the Dead Sea and than to Jerusalem, Betlehem and back to Tel Aviv. t took us like three weeks, we had a Mazda first, a Jeep in the Sinai and a Fiat back to the north. It was fun.

A friend of mine, a former fellow student, is in Israel almost every year, he does archeological excavation there, he is a volunteer. Some times ago he wrote a database application for the people there to store data about the findings with pictures and so, then he has been there lately, they still used it.
 
To hire an Israeli coach would be a good idea then.


I liked it a lot. We were going to see Haifa Technion and we saw signs with "University written" on it. We had no idea that there is more than one University in Haifa. So the one we looked at was actually Haifa University, not Haifa Technion. But it was in a nice part of a beautiful city and you there was a phantastic look at the sea and the harbour from there.

We came from Tel Aviv, went to Jaffa, then to the north, to Haifa and Akko, then to Tiberias, to the south, Beer Sheba, Mitzpe Ramon and Eilat, down to the Sinai peninsula, than to the north again to the Dead Sea and than to Jerusalem, Betlehem and back to Tel Aviv. t took us like three weeks, we had a Mazda first, a Jeep in the Sinai and a Fiat back to the north. It was fun.

A friend of mine, a former fellow student, is in Israel almost every year, he does archeological excavation there, he is a volunteer. Some times ago he wrote a database application for the people there to store data about the findings with pictures and so, then he has been there lately, they still used it.
Very interesting, thanks for sharing!
 
Can you provide non-religious reasons as to why this land should be owned by Israel?
I didn't provide any "religious" reasons. I provided a HISTORICAL EVIDENCE. The revelation in mt. Sinai (and also the Exodus prior to it) isn't a "religious" reason. It's a HISTORICAL EVIDENCE.

All the members of the nation of Israel witnessed this revelation in mt. Sinai in which G-d spoke the commandments to this nation (in the opposite to "religions" which are invented pagan dreams which nobody witnessed and which were forced on many nations IN THE OPPOSITE TO THE WORDS OF G-D, read this link). All the members of the nation of Israel received the book of Torah which says that they witnessed its giving.

*** [All the Jews must keep commandments! Therefore don't speak about "religious Jews" but about OBSERVANT Jews who keep the commandments that their ancestors got in mt. Sinai. The majority of the Jews in Israel do keep the majority of the commandments, and I have information about it. Secular Jews doesn't mean atheist ones!]

Same goes for the covenant between G-d and the gentiles e.g. the 7 Noachide commandments. And I'm reminding you for the 2nd time that commandments are laws of behavior that G-d gave us humans.

G-d hates religions. Religions cause wars, pogroms, crusades, blood libels (also today in Europe), inquisition, holocaust, Jihad terror attacks.

G-d wants Jews to follow 613 commandmets (and the 10 commandments as their basis, minus the ones which are relating to the temple, they will be re-implemented in the future) and gentiles to follow 7 commandments.

Judaism isn't a "religion", Judaism is a HISTORICAL COVENANT! And the state of Israel isn't a state for the Jewish "religion" but for the Jewish people (descendants of Judah). The states in the world aren't based upon religions but upon nationalities.

There's no Christian/Islamic nation, there's a Christian/Islamic religion which were forced on many nations. A Christian/Muslim believer in Egypt has no ethnic connection to a Christian/Muslim believer in Germany. They belong to 2 different nations.

There's no Jewish religion, there's a Jewish nation which was exiled 2000 years ago and was scattered among all countries. A Jew (descendant of Judah) in Egypt has an ethnic connection to a Jew in Germany because they belong to the same nation.

A Jew in Egypt isn't "an Egyptian/Arab who believes in Judaism". Jews and Arabs belong to 2 different nations. Jews are descendants of Judah (and of Israel) and Arabs are descendants of Ishmael and Esau.

Same goes for a Jew in Germany who isn't "a German who believes in Judaism". Jews and Germans belong to 2 different nations. Even a Jew who believes in Buddha is still a Jew (although evade one) in the same way your son will always be your son even if he will believe that an alien from Mars is his real father and not you.

As I said, Judaism isn't a religion but a covenant and a nationality. You can't convert to being a Jew because you can't convert your nationality. A Jew can become Chinese tomorrow? Of course not! He can move to China or to be a citizen of China but a Jew isn't Chinese, he isn't a descendant of Cin.

Same goes for gentiles who want to follow 613 commandments. They aren't called Jews but Ger Tzedek. Ger is alien/stranger and Tzedek is righteousness in Hebrew. They aren't Jews because they aren't called Jews. Even in the 18th morning prayer they are mentioned in the name of Ger Tzedek, when we ask G-d to have mercy on us and on the Ger Tzedek. They aren't Jews because they aren't descendants of Judah. If they were Jews then they would be called Jews.

The fact that they aren't Jews doesn't say that they aren't full members in the Jewish community nor that they are treated differently than the Jews. They are as Jews and they are in the same status of Jews.

Listen G-Man, Jews are commanded to live in the land of Israel! Living in the land of Israel is the MAIN part of the Jewish essence!

G-d is Zionist, he wants the Jews to live in their homeland because he wants them separated from the gentiles. He said that. G-d doesn't like when Jews are living abroad, it's a dangerous place for them, they might get murdered, that's what happened, that's what happening also now.

He said that they would get addicted to the idolatry of the gentiles and will abandon the laws of behavior (commandments), that's what happened and that's what happening now, almost 50% of the Jews in USA marry non Jews. Go and read in the Torah (you better do it in Hebrew) what G-d said about the outcome of that.

I saw you keep mentioning NK. I related to them more than once in this forum. I see you keep spreading lies about Israel using NK, here's an updated information about them.

Which Arab countries do you think do not belong to the Arabs?
Oh, are you asking seriously?

All the 20 which they occupied when they got out of the dumpster of Saudi Arabia their homeland. Let's talk about 3 of them.

The language talked in Egypt is the same language talked in Syria and in Iraq, the Arab language.

The names that the people in Egypt give to their children aren't different than the names that their brothers and sisters in Syria and in Iraq give to their children, Arab names.

The tradition in Egypt, Syria and Iraq is the same, the Arab tradition.

The mentality of the people in Egypt, in Syria and in Iraq is the same mentality, the Arab mentality.

The food eaten in Egypt is the same in Syria and in Iraq, the Arab food.

The people in Egypt, in Syria and in Iraq believe in the same murderous pagan dream, the Islam. The ancestors of these people started to slaughter Jews not only since 1860 when the Jews got out of the old quarter of Jerusalem to build new neighbourhoods (because they suffered from density and diseases) but since the days of Mohammad who slaughtered Jews in Saudi Arabia who refused to accept his dreams:

Jerusalem, too, underwent the process of Islamization: at first Muhammad attempted to convince the Jews near Medina to join his young community, and, by way of persuasion, established the direction of prayer (kiblah) to be to the north, towards Jerusalem, in keeping with Jewish practice; but after he failed in this attempt he turned against the Jews, killed many of them, and directed the kiblah southward, towards Mecca. Full article inside

There's no Egyptian nation, there's no Syrian nation, there's no Iraqi nation, there's no Jordanian nation, there's no Lebanese nation etc.

What there is is an ARAB nation, the most greedy nation in the world, which went out of Saudi Arabia and occupied 20 countries which weren't belong to them, forced the dreams of Islam on the residents there and turned these countries to Arab ones. And self-righteous persons like you don't have any problem with that. They don't even understand what I'm talking about. You have problems with couple of Jews who returned to their homeland.

If you have never seen the ME, if your father has never seen it, nor his father, nor his fathers father, nor his fathers fathers father, nor his fathers fathers fathers father nor any member of your family for hundreds and hundreds of years then I do not believe a place thousands of miles away from where you live is your 'homeland' no. Certainly not when the land that you claim is already occupied and has been so for hundreds of years.
I also didn't see the wedding of my great great grandfather and I know he got married. He had a document that proved he got married, with witnesses signed on it. We also have a document for our ownership of this land, read below. Do you have an ownership document for the land you are standing on?

Jews have been living in the land of Israel since more than 3400 years ago, much before the Arabs got out of Saudi Arabia and occupied parts of this land as they did to other 20 countries. Are you denying the fact that there was a Jewish state here? Are you denying the fact that there were Jewish kings here? Are you denying the fact that there was a Jewish capital here? Are you denying the fact that there was a Jewish temple here? Are you denying the fact that G-d never commanded the Arab gentiles to build a pagan temple in the most holy place for Jews?

There were Jews who continued to live here and weren't exiled by the Romans. Jewish communites were in Jerusalem, in Haifa, in Tiberias, in Safed. In the last 2000 years there were more Jews here than Arabs.

This place belongs to the Jewish nation, it's a legacy of the Jewish nation. We have the ownership document of it.

We were exiled and now by all right we came back. G-d said that we will come back. And by all right the Arabs will stop their terror occupation in the middle east in general and in the land of Israel in particular and will return back to from were they got out - Saudi Arabia. You know when it will happen? When there will be peace. Your thread is about "peace". You know when there will be peace? When Israel will destroy its enemies. Completely. Until now Israel only played with its enemies.

then I do not believe...
We don't care about what imaginations non Noachide gentiles like you believe in. We care about what we KNOW!

You think you can say whatever you want and do whatever you want, well you are very wrong.

The title is 'Jewishmag' - if you want me to read a soure then fine. I have no problem with reading what others put up but ONLY if the source can be deemed to be independent. There is no way you can seriously expect someone to accept that as an unbiased source. Find a different source and post it and I will read it.
Oh, so if it's a Jewish website it doesn't tell the truth? You want to hear also the "other side"? If someone would murder one of your family members would you be interested in hearing "his side" also?

I have enough dealing with one extremist in Vader let alone another :rofl
Hey look you all, G-Man our little kid has learned a new word in kindergarten today: "extremist"!

Why do you call Dr. Mordechai Kedar "extremist"? Only because he speaks the truth about the Koran and about Jerusalem? You call every Jew who speaks the truth "extremist"? It seems that for you every Jew who got out of your ghettos and death camps is "extremist". Even the Arab interviewer in Al-Jazeera was left stunnded from the correct answers of Dr. Kedar so he asked him to move on to the next topic.

Can you guys source anything which has sound reasoned arguments?
So the truth isn't reasonable enough for you? From reading your posts one can easily declare that Josef Goebbels couldn't ask for a better successor than you.

I won't relate to things that I already gave you answers about, no matter what you will say, I don't care what Amalekites like you say.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom