Quote:
Originally Posted by galenrox  How so? |
ARe you that academically lazy? I'm starting to see why you don't understand the simple concepts that have been explained to you here and attempt to assign sentience to inanimate objects.
Boiling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Evaporation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Religion conflicting with Facts) Quote:
|
Originally Posted by galenrox http://www.debatepolitics.com/1057644914-post141.html |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by galenrox |
That's not presenting a negative argument, that's stating the obvious. You claim it to be god prove it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by galenrox Jesus is the one who understood God. It is your mistaken assumption that to believe in a Christian God you must believe that the Earth was created in 7 days, that there was a literal voice coming down telling Abraham to kill his son, told Noah to build an ark or any of that ****. |
I didn't state of any need to believe in the rubbish superstitious literal interpretation. No one here but you has. Yet your bible clearly says that god told them to do just that. Jesus christ is the embodyment of god, different persons yet one and the same - which you prescribe as being energy - nothing more nothing less. Hence you are indeed proclaiming that energy is sentient - as I've asked, prove it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by galenrox As I am a Christian who follows the teachings of the Christian bible, you're not in a position to assign me positions. |
I'm not in a position? Why wouldn't I be in a position? You're not a scientist yet that does not prevent you from attempting to make scientific validations.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by galenrox If you have any logical justification to your position you would not need to resort to such an illogical tactic. |
As I've said, you are the one making the claim that energy = god YOU bear the burden of proof. You claim god exists the burden of proof that god exists rests with you. You are the christian - though you throw out the bible as **** - so the burden of proof rests with you that there is a christian god. You can't cherry pick and say the christian god exists because the bible says this and this and that then in following posts also claim that the bible is "****". Fact of the matter is your god has as much substance of existence as the flying pink elephants brought up earlier.
ie, if I claimed that I was god the burden of proof rests with me to prove so - or should I just tell you, nope, don't question it, I am god you need to have faith in my being god. Spare me the ridiculous rubbish.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by galenrox You've clearly demonstrated that I should've said H2O when I said water, which is why you are incapable of presenting an argument which would connect what you've claimed to demonstrated together to demonstrate what you've claimed. Sprinkling in ad hominem doesn't change the fact that you've said nothing of value. |
You initially did say H2O in fact you stated.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gal If you are stating no energy in the world is sentient, do you have any logical justification for said position or is it something you take purely on faith? The ability to convert energy into any other form of energy shows that it's all the same thing, and its current status is solely a product of other environmental features. H2O is still H2O regardless of whether it's 0 degrees C or 100 degrees C, you're yet to provide any explanation as to why energy is conceptually different. |
Then stated
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gal But it's the same element no matter what, it's the same thing in a different form. |
But in fact even H2O is not an element, made up of elements certainly but not an element itself. As well as the fact that at 0C it's in a fluctuating state becoming a solid - structurally completely different as is the case with it at 100C becoming a gas or condensing into a liquid.
Water at 60C kills nearly all pathogens where as half that to 30C and it's a perfect temperature for growth.
You're understanding of these facts is clearly obfuscated by your desire to validate your religious beliefs. You are the perfect example of the title of the thread of religion conflicting with facts - but perhaps more sinister in how you have been dishonestly twisting the facts so as to match your arguments.