Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Detector  Again, your RHETORIC is a deliberate exaggeration about an issue that was of GREAT concern in a pathetically weak effort to make the President look bad. But alas, you and your fellow Democrats, Liberals and Leftists have the benefit of HINDSIGHT; something you all exhibit a great propensity for which is also called "second guessing" after the fact.
It doesn't take much intellect to play that game. |
You have a
to quoque and ad homs for a rebuttal.
I think the ad homs may be the stronger and more practiced of your two techniques.
You seem to be taking this very, very personally.
ETA
oh yeah thanks for showing me what the PotUS said. Wherever did you find that quote?
When you get ready feel free to demonstrate what i said that was actually inaccurate. It would also helo if you backed up your implied claim that the info about the uavs was not available at the time and you claim that I was unaware of the nfo re the uavs @ the time.
Or if you'd rather, you may continue w/ your current tack.
here are some more techniques you may want to practice and apply if you dont already:
Logical Fallacies: The Fallacy Files
you can increase you repertoire of logical fallacies quickly and easily w/ the interwebs
gl