Originally Posted by justone

Due to certain personal incapables your request about spelling cannot be satisfied. Nobody is forced to reply to justone. As the matter of fact all evolutionists and atheists have put me on ignore list, - at least they say so, - when you run out of arguments you will finish with the same argument..




Hey big boy, where did you find a slightest hint about any conditions or exclusions in the OP?


Can you quote it to me from the OP?

Is my objection to the words of the OP quoted by me and to the meaning of the words is correct? Did I miss anything in the OP?

Yes or no?
Am I correct pointing that the OP is totally misrepresenting E coli?

Can you answer yes or no, - or you would prefer to keep on spinning?


If you prefer to keep on spinning and endlessly adding and correcting your statements, I may abstain from discussion of the page 7900 with no links provided by you, when I have provided my link.

So, let me get it straight – it has been known that some E-coli bacteria under some conditions in the presence of some coenzymes can process citrate and it still remain to be E-coli bacteria.

Am I correct – yes or no?

So, can you come again please, - tell me slowly so I wouldn’t miss a word again - in the experiment on page 7900 E-coli bacteria has evolved into ______________? Would you fill the blank, please?

I am not a biologist, so I am just very curious, big boy. I hope you are a biologist, since you are a big boy, - all evolutionists here are biologists and big boys.