Originally Posted by justone

Another good news for science!


As always evolutionists make things up.


It had been clear for long time that E-coli used citrate:

“’Under anoxic conditions in the presence of an oxidizable cosubstrate such as qlucoseor glycerol E. coli converts citrate to acetate and succinate.”

http://jb.asm.org/cgi/reprint/180/16/4160.pdf

Another good news for science, and the bad news for pseudo-science.

This is the beginning and the end of the news. As usual evolutionists only demonstrate their ignorance and deception.

There is a lot to say about the deception of “’microevolution’’ and how “’microevolution’’ proves “’macroevolution’’ (because ‘’macroevolution’’ obviously has failed long time ago).

The statement that a certain enhanced mechanism can ever distinguish any bacteria from other species is strictly designed to impose lie and deception. There is no other purpose of such a statement.

This is making an illusion that somebody in the right mind can agree with evolutionists that bacteria with different mechanism are different species, different bacterias (even if MS word does not allow such a spelling); and that bacteria is not different specie alltogether, that IT is not a separate phenomena, but IT is like in the evolutionary chain with the man, like we are one specie and bacteria is another specie and fish are 3rd species and salmon in the 4th specie and ionfish is the fifth seprate spicie--- of what???


Many more things can be said but about the article but I don’t have time. The link provided by me shows that the very base of the “experiment”’ is a deception. E-coli DO has an ability to use citrate, as the old paper proofs.

I will give you 2 more chances to link me to one justone peer reviewed publication ''observing'' microevolution.

Nobody relly reviews evolutionists anymore, so you are lucky. Shoot.