• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

McCain's YouTube Problem Just Became a Nightmare

While people people discuss who does and doesn't live under a bridge, it is not lost on me that no one has come to defend McCain's lies. I posted a video. I didn't make the video, I didn't produce it, I just saw it and shared it with you. If you think McCain's actual lies are the same thing as taking Obama's words out of context so it appears that he is lying, I can't help you with your bias.
 
While people people discuss who does and doesn't live under a bridge, it is not lost on me that no one has come to defend McCain's lies. I posted a video. I didn't make the video, I didn't produce it, I just saw it and shared it with you. If you think McCain's actual lies are the same thing as taking Obama's words out of context so it appears that he is lying, I can't help you with your bias.



There you go again. Everyone is taking poor obama out of context..... :roll:
 
He's questioning the motivation of the poster, namely suggesting that he's got a strong obama bias which could be simply blowing the issue up greater than it is.

If he makes the comment in every, single, thread that IT makes about McCain then I would call it trolling...as I did with a few people that posted it in every, single, thread RH posted about Obama.

I never once warned someone for trolling because they asked it in one thread, and neither would I here, because its not. He's not attacking a poster, he's questioning a posters motives and biases in putting across the story, which is a legitimate debating tactic as long as its not the ONLY tactic you end up using.

Zyphlin, it was trolling. He tried to derail the real issue by trying to dismiss the content of the post by saying that I am an Obama supporter. It was trolling due to the fact that I showed that he had started over 20 anti-Obama threads compared to only 3 anit-Clinton and 3 anti-McCain threads. He was trying to claim that he disliked them just as much. I used his actions to prove his words wrong. You see, the difference is I admit my support for Obama. He doesn't admit that he is more biased against Obama than McCain even though he claims to dislike them both equally. If you think that once someone supports a candidate they can't start a thread about the opponent that would be taken seriously, then I am sorry, this is a cheerleading site and not a debate site. It's a good thing that I still know this place to be a debate forum.

I pressed him how many times to address the issue? It's on record. Look it up.

You don't have to follow people around to troll a thread. Even you don't dare defend McCain's lies. You know better.

All you have is derailing the thread. I know you don't support McCain, but you seem inclined to campaign against Obama. You have that right. You don't deny that fact. But let's not pretend for a second what I have posted in the OP is equivalent to multiple "typical white person" threads. Which have bore no fruit each time. If any of you "true conservatives" (ashamed republicans) want to tackle McCain's lies then be my guest.

Otherwise, send this baby downstairs.
 
You know what is funny IT. You sure can dish it but when anyone questions you regarding a thread like this or Obama the are trolling.

Why do you have such a double standard?
 
LET'S GET READY TO RUMBLE

send it to the Basement so we can settle this like men :lol:
 
There you go again. Everyone is taking poor obama out of context..... :roll:

Or, in the case of the bitter comments, us rural middle class where just too stupid to understand Obama's geniousness.
 
Gee and what was it when you attacked my obama threads (all of course ignoring the ones on his actual issues)? :2wave:

I explained to you why that was.

So, which McCain do you think is the real one?
 
You know what is funny IT. You sure can dish it but when anyone questions you regarding a thread like this or Obama the are trolling.

Why do you have such a double standard?

I didn't report you. I merely called you on it publicly. You derailed this thread. Mission Accomplished.
 
I didn't report you. I merely called you on it publicly. You derailed this thread. Mission Accomplished.




There is nothing to report. I simply pointed out your hypocrisy. You trolled me for 10+ threads then complained when ANYONE else dares critisize your schoolgirl crush on obama. :2wave:
 
There is nothing to report. I simply pointed out your hypocrisy. You trolled me for 10+ threads then complained when ANYONE else dares critisize your schoolgirl crush on obama. :2wave:

:rofl

Anywho, got any McCain lies that you would like to comment on?
 
His health care plan doesn't cut out the middleman, the insurance companies.

But you like it better than what we have now? are you for barring of insurance companies?


Thanks. Why is he an idiot?


1. McCain finegold

2. illegal amnesty

3. "the maverick" (cows to libs to much)

4. racist and like obama too stupid to hide it.

5. need more?
 
But you like it better than what we have now? are you for barring of insurance companies?

Yes, I do. Yes, if we want a national healthcare, we don't need insurance companies. Otherwise, the govt. would just be subsidizing them which adds to the cost.



1. McCain finegold

2. illegal amnesty

3. "the maverick" (cows to libs to much)

4. racist and like obama too stupid to hide it.

5. need more?

Don't let me stop you. :)
 
Gee how come I don't see you posting threads critical of obama. What is your motivation here. We all know. :roll:

Do you ever mention things like this to NP? If not, then shut up and stay on topic.

McCain is all over the board here, and that's the important thing to note. He hasn't told a self-consistent story and I'm supposed to believe this guy has the intellectual capacity to handle President? He lies, he back tracks, he flip flops at every possible opportunity. Not that Obama is that much better, maybe just slightly better (as Obama is at least intelligent enough to give problems actual thought, though I don't agree with his base socialist nature). But here we have the GOP candidate and he continually contradicts himself...what are we to believe? I think it's very Clinton like behavior, lie and tell the people what they want at that time and don't worry about saying the opposite a little later down the road. Doesn't seem to be a candidate of integrity or quality.
 
Do you ever mention things like this to NP? If not, then shut up and stay on topic.


Funny how you never told IT to shut up. Why you on my jock? You can't get with this playa..... :lol:

McCain is all over the board here, and that's the important thing to note. He hasn't told a self-consistent story and I'm supposed to believe this guy has the intellectual capacity to handle President? He lies, he back tracks, he flip flops at every possible opportunity. Not that Obama is that much better, maybe just slightly better (as Obama is at least intelligent enough to give problems actual thought, though I don't agree with his base socialist nature). But here we have the GOP candidate and he continually contradicts himself...what are we to believe? I think it's very Clinton like behavior, lie and tell the people what they want at that time and don't worry about saying the opposite a little later down the road. Doesn't seem to be a candidate of integrity or quality.



I agree with you here except Obama has an inability to make correct choices.
 
Back
Top Bottom