Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Man  The US government has opposed these settlements - are you accusing the white house of pushing a pro-terrorist liberal agenda? |
We're not discussing the Whitehouse at this time; however, they have made their fair share of mistakes. Backing down to terrorist assclowns and thier liberal apologist/supporter buddies are not among them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Man Jerusalem means 'temple of the jews' - is this it?
Is this really all of your argument? Can you not debate your position with anything more than that? |
The point I was trying to make is that the arabs are attempting to assert a claim over something that isn't theirs. Jerusalem means "Temple of the Jews" this is a given fact and it is good evidence of the original ownership of the land.
I realize this is difficult of the terrorists and their liberal apologist buddies to accept but it is a fact and it isn't going to change.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Man N.B Doesn't Indiana translate into 'land of Indians' - should we only allow indians to live there? |
This is a poor attempt at a comparison, which failed miserably to do ANYTHING but make you look foolish. Good job on that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Man Your points are too weak to label as arguments. |
According to terrorists and their liberal apologist buddies. At least I have points. You post only propaganda and try to defend it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Man Israeli citizens have a home in Israel - not where these settlements are planned. |
The places they're building settlements are part of Israel ... so yes, they do have a right to a home there.
