Quote:
Originally Posted by Scucca  The proof is in your continued failure to make any relevant counter-argument. |
Perhaps you are just confused about what is and what is
not proof.
You made an assertion, and you cannot prove it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scucca You haven't read the article, nor have your read any of the empirical or theoretical evidence. That is darn obvious |
Just repeating your assertion, and again, without the requested proof.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scucca Your understanding of externalities and its impact for the market price is of course zero. |
Already addressed, right here :
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voidwar Man, you really are thick. I have explained to you more than ten times on this thread alone that I completely understand your argument, I just reject it because it is false. You keep trying this tired tactic of repeating that accusation, and it does nothing but make you look defeated and desperate, in denial and repeating a failed mantra. |
By the way, in case your addled mind allowed it to slip again, THIS is the point you are currently dodging . . .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voidwar Even if your mythical "externalities" existed, you are submitting your "bill" to the wrong party. The "bill" for your alleged "social costs" should be submitted to the perpetrator of the incident. |