Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child Define 'prove.' |
Thanks…. really, - thanks... It all depends on the definition of “”Yes”’.
There is one thing about atheists here – they make me laugh...
Define ‘’define”.
Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child Literal Creationism was evicted from public schools. The only way that Creationism can get back in is under the guise of being 'science.' |
Thanks again, - you said ID but not LC, and I replied to ID but not LC. Thanks for making another joke.
Thus it is proven that when you came up with the OP you knew that ID=LC, and you were merely pretending that you had some intention to rise an intellectual conversation. Thanks for another demonstration of the intellectual level of atheism …
Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child Apparently if one doesn't accept creationism and does accept evolution, they are atheists. I'll be sure to tell millions of Shintos, Buddhists, Metaphorical Christians/Jews/Muslims all of the other religious folk that they are actually atheists. |
It could be so and may be it could not be so, - my question was – ‘’’What particular ‘’large’’ parts? Tights? Breasts? Legs? And what (are) is about the small parts, - heart, liver and kidneys?’’ You have no answer, and I have not expected you to have any
Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child Start reading:
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: the Scientific Case for Common Descent |
Hey, there are 100s of 1000s of pages , if not millions of millions written with the only purpose of bringing in confusion and deception and demonstrating the lack of intellect; – but for a reasonable mind – why do I have to read all the pages, if the first line about the ‘’large parts’’ clearly shows as a product of an insane mind? Does a psychiatrist have to go through all details and twists of a schizophrenic mind to make a diagnosis?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/religi...nostics-5.html (Proof, negatives, existence, and Agnostics) - #47
http://www.debatepolitics.com/religi...nostics-6.html (Proof, negatives, existence, and Agnostics) - #54
Here comes the simple truth Christian Creationist scientists have behind them:
Laws - not theories, not hypotheses – but laws of genetics discovered 150 years ago by a Christian Creationist scientist, who in order to be a Christian Creationist was primarily trained in mathematics.
Darwin failed mathematic completely. He wouldn’t pass a 4th grade exam.
Thus there is no possibility of an intellectual debate between Christian Creationist scientists and Darwinists-atheists.
The laws of genetics not only have been proven with endless experiments but also have been described mathematically and they tell us that evolution is impossible The same laws of math and the theory of information are applicable to everything in the universe, in the same way as thermodynamics. You can write millions of pages, but you cannot beat math. You cannot beat the simple truth about entropy of information, - that no new information can rise from the combination of old bits of information. You can take all copper coins but however you toss them, they would have the same heads and tails and no silver coin would appear between them, and the total value wouldn’t increase even by a single cent. You can loose some coins tossing, but you would never add a coin. That’s it. It is so simple a child can understand.
Christian creationist scientists have the simple truth behind them while Evolutionists have tons of pages filled with meaningless absurd. The intellectual debate is impossible, but now there are a lot more chances for Christian creationist scientists. Evolutionists-atheists always based their debate on lies, cheating, billions spend for brainwashing, and brutal force. One of their leaders was torturing geneticists and murdering them and putting them in hard labor camps. But today evolutionists have completely lost the support of Stalinists. All they have is China and North Korea, but there is a great cultural and language barrier which works against evolutionists –atheists. Atheistic ‘’scientists” resorting to mass appeal to the mob, ignorant masses in a scientific inquiry without the armed back up of Marxism-Leninism-Stalinism are rather funny – like clowns.
BTW, many people brainwashed by the atheistic propaganda do not know that the term ID was introduced by Christian creationists 500 years ago, - it is a specific term of Christian theology and it has been used as one of the description of the Christian G-d. If some “’new born’’ scientists discover ID for themselves and are not familiar with Christianity it does not change the fact that ID belongs to the Christian religion. So my friend
Jerry is all correct about tires and a car.