Quote:
Originally Posted by OKgrannie  Please, no one is better at using the language to suit their agenda euphemistically and with emotional appeal than the pro-life camp. Examples are the term "pro-life" itself, going on to "innocent child in the womb", "inconvenience", "murderer", "baby-killer", and so on, ad infinitum. |
Both sides do it. I, personally, try to avoid such abuse of language for that very reason. I don't need emotional rhetoric to state the facts of the matter.
Quote:
|
The definition of pregnancy was changed when understanding was developed of what was actually happening after fertilization.
|
Why do you feel it necessary, then, to ignore the agenda-driven impetus. It's a fact that the abortion agenda was considered and that social manipulation occurred as a result. It's proof of the social engineering inherent in the AOD (abortion on demand) agenda.