Quote:
Originally Posted by Felicity  They do not agree, obviously, or there wouldn't be debate within the medical community on the matter. The fact remains that the definition of pregnancy was CHANGED to suit the agenda that supports abortifacient birth control. It's a fact that changing the long accepted definition of pregnancy from beginning at conception to beginning at implantation--whether one finds it an acceptable change or not--found its origin in the purposeful, agenda-driven redefinition of the language for the express purpose of "the social advantage" of the "habit of speech" as Dr. Boving stated in 1959 and which the ACOG then adopted. That same tactic is used today with the added twist of using euphemisms for the reality of what the abortion proponents promulgate. I.e. "pro-choice," "selective reduction," "termination of pregnancy" among so many... |
The definition of pregnancy was changed when understanding was developed of what was actually happening after fertilization. Please, no one is better at using the language to suit their agenda euphemistically and with emotional appeal than the pro-life camp. Examples are the term "pro-life" itself, going on to "innocent child in the womb", "inconvenience", "murderer", "baby-killer", and so on, ad infinitum.