Debate Politics Forums - View Single Post

Goobieman · 05-19-08, 03:33 PM

So, now that we have established that the 2nd amendment does indeed protect an individual right to keep and bear arms, what argument is there that infringements on that right should be/must be/can be tolerated?

After all, if we can simply ignore the Constitution whenever it is simple "common sense" to do so, what point is there in having a Constitution at all?

05-19-08, 03:33 PM	#365 (permalink)
Goobieman Yer favorite damn disease Join Date: Feb 2006 Last Online: Today 04:34 PM Posts: 6,648 Thanks: 8 Thanked 380 Times in 287 Posts Lean: Very Conservative Gender: Current Mood:	Re: Do Fewer Guns Mean Less Crime? So, now that we have established that the 2nd amendment does indeed protect an individual right to keep and bear arms, what argument is there that infringements on that right should be/must be/can be tolerated? After all, if we can simply ignore the Constitution whenever it is simple "common sense" to do so, what point is there in having a Constitution at all? __________________ Haven't you noticed? We've been sharing our culture with you all morning. -- King Leonidas