Quote:
Originally Posted by AsIseeIt  --snip-- I rewrite part of my previous post with additional words and changes in square brackets:
"--snip-- [In my opinion], it would be provocative and adding insult to injury for somebody, especially a Chinese citizen, [to support Tibetan separatism by protesting with a Tibetan flag which is officially banned because it is a symbol of Tibetan separatism] on Chinese soil." |
Could you explain
why it would be provocative and add insult to injury for a Chinese to support Tibetan separatism? Whether on Chinese soil or on Western soil?
I was most heartily encouraged to see the very first Chinese citizen protesting against Chinese rule in/of Tibet was actually on Chinese soil. None elsewhere in the world have said anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsIseeIt --snip-- Your support for my imaginary American Al Qaeda girl's right of protest is incredible. Your stand on her right of protest is so unreal that you seem to join her in celebrating Al Qaeda's successful attacks on America on September 11, 2001. --snip-- |
jfuh has already gone some way to answering your point but...
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsIseeIt So that is Western idealism! Let these video clips speak for themselves.
1. Police brutality at Vermont, 2007>>>
2. Police brutality on May 1st 2007 Immigration Rally in Los Angeles MacArthur Park>>>
3. No Borders Camp Immigration Protest>>> |
The principles of free speech may be something you need to study further if you think police brutality is either a result of or caused by Free Speech?
Freedom of speech - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia