View Single Post
Old 04-29-08, 08:40 AM   #46 (permalink)
Lerxst
Liberal elite guy



 
Lerxst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Last Online: Today 12:09 PM
Location: In your banks...redistributing your wealths
Posts: 6,925
Thanks: 1,181
Thanked 1,557 Times in 1,008 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Army Reserve:  12 years US Army Reserve US Army:  4 years active duty, US Army 

Current Mood:
Amused
Re: Ventura’s 9/11 Questions Break Through Mainstream Media Dam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanda View Post
Irrelevant. If wtc7 collapsed by controlled demolition, then the entire official conspiracy theory is bogus.
Present ANYTHING credible that supports it was a controlled demolition or other type of deliberate destruction.

Quote:
Experts disagree.
Experts disagree on a lot of things about this, they disagree with each other in fact.

Quote:
There are several videos online that appear to show demolition charges.
Hmmm...appear? And there are explanations to those puffs of smoke that have debunked them as squib charges.

Quote:
The explanation for Silverstein's "pull it" order is unconvincing. According to several sources, there were no firefighters in the building to evacuate. There are numerous witnesses who heard explosions, even a countdown.
Nor were there demolitions experts in there to "pull the building" either. Nor was there a shred of evidence of cutter charges or any type of explosive. In fact there is a very detailed working hypothesis of exactly why the building collapsed the way it did. But hang on to "pull it" and "witnesses" who "heard things." The evidence stands against them. And their lack of evidence damns them.
__________________
I was so right. And you? Well you were so wrong. You lost. Ha. Ha.
Lerxst is offline   Reply With Quote