Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffMerriman  Please show me one instance in history where a steel framed skyscraper was hit by a jet airliner full of fuel and traveling several hundred miles per hour and iddn't collapse. |
WTC7 wasn't hit by an airliner. It had minimal debris damage on one side, and relatively small office fires which makes the straight-down collapse into its own footprint suspect. NIST has yet to release its wtc7 investigative report and at last update, was still considering possible causes for the collapse after 6 years of investigation. Maybe you should offer your expertise, since you seem to know exactly how it happened. NIST needs you, Jeff.
Quote:
|
The intense heat with combined with the severe weakening of the structural integrity brought those buildings down....blah blah...there was no physical evidence of thermite recovered (yes, there was)... would have been too huge to keep secret...blah blah blah...thousands of gallons of burning fuel ...blah blah...the attacks alone would have been enough....deed...done....
|
Entirely speculation. We have no frame of reference to determine exactly what would happen under these circumstances.
Quote:
|
Al Qaeda did this, period. They flew jetliners full of fuel into the buildings at several hundred miles an hour. End of story. The rest of this stuff is just unsubstantiated lunacy. Skepticism is fine, but don't confuse it with evidence or even credibility.
|
What substantiated proof has our government offered that members of Al Qaeda conspired to commit the 9/11 attacks? You are the conspiracy theorist, Jeff. I don't have a theory, and I've made no conclusions, but I'm skeptical of the official conspiracy theory, because it is the kookiest one yet.