Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkWizard12  No. Its counter-productive. There is nothing to debate. Did Taiwan uphold a verdict or not? Really now, how can anyone debate that? I'm only asking your provide the WHY. WHY did the court make that decision. And, no, it wasn't because the "Pan Green sucks"
Ok.
I affirm that some taiwan court upholded Ma's innocent verdict. Aha! The link says so! I win.
I'm not saying reuters is partisan. I'm saying its useless, and your little remarks in the beginning did nothing to spur honest debate. |
Again, if you understood the context you would understand. Right now you're simply being obtuse and arguing for the sake of argument rather than the topic at hand.
If you wish to debate then look up pan green look up pan blue look up the controversy surrounding the allegations that led to Ma's "indictment" in the first place