Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkWizard12  Not from Reuters, from you.
They reported that the SUPREME COURT of Taiwan said he was "not guilty". Good for reuters. Thats a fact. What else is a fact is that I am not the supreme court, therefore I can decide for myself whether or not he is guilty in my mind.
Now, if I may see a transcript of the court case, or evidence or anyhting that was discussed at the court so that there IS something to debate besides "did the taiwan court find Ma guilty?" BEcause, you know, that simple fact is not much for a debate. |
So presenting Reuters is thus partisan? Presenting a news article unless I present both sides of the court case is then partisan?
Sorry like any topic here in this forum, if you're going to debate it or wish to debate it you better bring in some knowledge about it. It's not my job to educate you on the matter. If you don't know the relevant material, either 1) already know something about it; or
2) do your homework on the topic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DarkWizard12 I have a right to free speech and I use as a shield to disagree with you. Don;t like it? Deal with it. |
It's quite simple DW, you either are going to debate the topic with what you know, do your homework and bring something to discuss, or shut up, sit on the side and learn something. If that's not your thing and you must bring in this UScentric rant about this forum or how you don't care, then don't care quite simple.