Quote:
Originally Posted by jfuh  Was there anything to lead you to believe of partisanship in that article from reuters? They simply presented the facts as is. If you are curious do your own homework before screaming foul play. |
Not from Reuters, from you.
They reported that the SUPREME COURT of Taiwan said he was "not guilty". Good for reuters. Thats a fact. What else is a fact is that I am not the supreme court, therefore I can decide for myself whether or not he is guilty in my mind.
Now, if I may see a transcript of the court case, or evidence or anyhting that was discussed at the court so that there IS something to debate besides "did the taiwan court find Ma guilty?" BEcause, you know, that simple fact is not much for a debate.
Quote:
Then I suggest you just take it and leave it then. Note the sub heading of the thread - international politics.
You don't care for it, then don't participate in it. You want to participate in it then do your homework before being an utter arse about it.
You don't care for anything in Asia that's your predicament, no one is forcing it upon you.
You want to make a big deal about it take it up with the mods then and express your desire to make this forum only about US affairs.
I have my right to free speech just as you do don't like it, tough deal with it.
|
I have a right to free speech and I use as a shield to disagree with you. Don;t like it? Deal with it.