View Single Post
Old 04-27-08, 07:47 PM   #30 (permalink)
Lerxst
Liberal elite guy



 
Lerxst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Last Online: Today 07:53 PM
Location: In your banks...redistributing your wealths
Posts: 6,917
Thanks: 1,180
Thanked 1,556 Times in 1,007 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Army Reserve:  12 years US Army Reserve US Army:  4 years active duty, US Army 

Current Mood:
Amused
Re: Police inciting violence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Voidwar View Post
Why yes, his staged deception resulted in a physical takedown and arrest, I watched the violence on the video.
Bull****. Try again, you are lying. There was no take down and arrest, it was staged to extricate them and protect their identity. That's one point you've lost.

Quote:
Yes, he brought a rock and wore deceptive clothes for a reason.
You have not proven what the reason was. You have only insinuated what the reason was based upon your speculation. The video offered no evidence as to what that cops specific reason was. Law enforcement infiltration of protest groups at public gatherings is a very common practice across the U.S., specifically in larger areas. Canada is no different. Given the historical practice and complete lack of evidence from your side, you lose this point. That's two.


Quote:
He was caught by protestors before he could use it.

What do you think it was for, some quick repairs to a nearby rock wall ?
You have presented not a single shred of evidence to prove that he was going to use it. Again, nothing more than insinuations and speculation from you. You lose this point. That three.


Quote:
Loads, but it is circumstantial. Good thing we are not in court, so circumstantial evidence is plenty relevant in determining their motives.
You have yet to present ONE single piece of evidence, let alone loads, to substantiate your claim. You would get steam rolled in court. You lose again. That's four.

Quote:
Explain the clothes and the rock in a way that isn't "agent provocatuer".
Already been done. Try to follow along. None of those men incited one single instance of violence. There is no evidence of any provocative acts. If it is there, post it.

Quote:
As citizens, discussing these dirtbags and whether we want our cops to engage in this underhanded practice, we do not have to meet the same levels of proof required in a court of law. I am condemning, not convicting.
In this debate forum you have to at least substantiate your claims if you are to have any credibility. You have failed miserably to do so and as such your credibility is non-existent. I didn't ask you for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. I asked you for some very basic examples of evidence to support your assertions. You have not presented one.
__________________
I was so right. And you? Well you were so wrong. You lost. Ha. Ha.
Lerxst is offline