View Single Post
Old 04-25-08, 11:21 AM   #21 (permalink)
independent_thinker2002
Secret Blogger
Dungeon Master


 
independent_thinker2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: Today 08:48 AM
Location: Nation of Whiners
Posts: 20,078
Thanks: 4,482
Thanked 2,740 Times in 1,968 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Devilish
Re: Ventura’s 9/11 Questions Break Through Mainstream Media Dam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanda View Post
Are you a physicist? Physicists say it isn't possible, except by controlled demolition:

Dave Heller, a builder with degrees in physics and architecture: "The floors could not have been pancaking. The buildings fell too quickly. The floors must all have been falling simultaneously to reach the ground in such a short amount of time. But how?"

Physicist Steven Jones: “the Towers fall very rapidly to the ground, with the upper part falling nearly as rapidly as ejected debris which provide free-fall references . . . . Where is the delay that must be expected due to conservation of momentum---one of the foundational Laws of Physics? That is, as upper-falling floors strike lower floors---and intact steel support columns---the fall must be significantly impeded by the impacted mass. . . . [b]ut this is not the case. . . . How do the upper floors fall so quickly, then, and still conserve momentum in the collapsing buildings? The contradiction is ignored by FEMA, NIST and 9/11 Commission reports where conservation of momentum and the fall times were not analyzed”

The Destruction of the World Trade Center:
Most buildings don't have an exoskeleton.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
Hell I could probably beat McCain.....
==]:{o
independent_thinker2002 is online now   Reply With Quote
Inline Ads