View Single Post
Old 04-14-08, 04:33 PM   #29 (permalink)
Goobieman
Yer favorite damn disease

 
Goobieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Last Online: Today 04:37 PM
Posts: 6,742
Thanks: 8
Thanked 399 Times in 303 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Grumpy
Re: Do Fewer Guns Mean Less Crime?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scucca View Post
You're asking for me to repeat myself.
No, I'm asking you to explain why somene who has nothing to do with a "cost" is expected to pay said cost.
Unless you can show my specific responsibility for that cost, there's no way you can argue that I should have to pay the cost.

Quote:
Taxes (or subsidies) should be used in any product with substantial externalities
.
So, given that libel and slander have substantial externalities, you would agree that people should have to pay a hefy licensing fee to exercise their right to free speech.

Quote:
There is no notion that the license will eliminate gun crime.
I didnt ask you about the elimination of gun crime, I asked you how it would affect criminals, the people that create the 'cost'.
__________________
Haven't you noticed? We've been sharing our culture with you all morning.
-- King Leonidas
Goobieman is offline