View Single Post
Old 04-14-08, 04:16 PM   #27 (permalink)
Goobieman
Yer favorite damn disease

 
Goobieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Last Online: Today 04:37 PM
Posts: 6,742
Thanks: 8
Thanked 399 Times in 303 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Grumpy
Re: Do Fewer Guns Mean Less Crime?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scucca View Post
You, as an individual, are only responsible for paying the price of the gun. It just happens that the price does not reflect the overall costs
So... if I, a law-abiding gun owner, am not responsible for the "true costs" of gun owership, as you say, why then should I be made to pay for those "true costs"?

And, again:
-What other rights have a "true cost" that should also suffer a hefty licensing fee?

Quote:
The fee, by increasing the price of ownership, reduces demand and therefore this source of deaths
This doesnt address my question.
Criminals do not license their guns, nor can they be forced to.
How will the high license fees affect criminals, who get their guns illegally?
__________________
Haven't you noticed? We've been sharing our culture with you all morning.
-- King Leonidas
Goobieman is offline