View Single Post
Old 01-04-08, 03:34 PM   #36 (permalink)
RightinNYC
Judicial Apologist
Mod team member
 
RightinNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 09:13 PM
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 13,837
Thanks: 1,021
Thanked 2,759 Times in 1,600 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 

Current Mood:
Approved
Re: Republican 2008 Primary Election: The DP Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
That is horse ****..........Perot was a fiscal Conservtive...........Clinton was a Fiscal Liberal.........If you don't believe me ask Zell Miller.........Perot cost Bush 1 the presidency..........
Associated Press, 11/4/1992:

Quote:
Exit polls suggest Ross Perot hurt George Bush and Bill Clinton about equally.

The Voter Research and Surveys poll, a joint project of the four major television networks, found 38 percent of Perot voters would have voted for Clinton and 37 percent would have voted for Bush if Perot had not been on the ballot. Fifteen percent said they would not have voted, and 6 percent listed other candidates.


Washington Post, 11/8/1992:

Quote:
Ross Perot's presence on the 1992 presidential ballot did not change the outcome of the election, according to an analysis of the second choices of Perot supporters.

The analysis, based on exit polls conducted by Voter Research & Surveys (VRS) for the major news organizations, indicated that in Perot's absence, only Ohio would have have shifted from the Clinton column to the Bush column. This would still have left Clinton with a healthy 349-to-189 majority in the electoral college.

And even in Ohio, the hypothetical Bush "margin" without Perot in the race was so small that given the normal margin of error in polls, the state still might have stuck with Clinton absent the Texas billionaire.
Washington Post, 11/12/1992:

Quote:
In House races, Perot voters split down the middle: 51 percent said they backed Republicans, 49 percent backed Democrats. In the presidential contest, 38 percent of Perot supporters said they would have supported Clinton if Perot had not been on the ballot and 37 percent said they would have supported Bush.

An additional 6 percent of Perot voters said they would have sought another third-party candidate, while 14 percent said they would not have voted if Perot had not run.
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
RightinNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RightinNYC For This Useful Post: