Shuamort said:
Quote:
|
You failed because your posts were no longer germane to my points.
|
lol Thank you for clarifying the debate rules for us.
Quote:
|
Of course, this has been in effect for over 200 years. And at that time, the republicans (vs the Federalists) held control not only over the Congress but the Presidency. If they didn't like the MvM decision, they most certainly could have legislated a law to stop it. And so on over the last 200 years. And you know what? That HAS NOT HAPPENED. It sure hasn't been too problematic over the course of the last 200 years to keep the balance of power in check by means of MvM (Dred Scott excluded, of course).
|
As you know, the court did not
misuse their assumed power or usurp their authority until the 20th century. The legislature failed to do their job, but that doesn’t mean we should continue to allow them to abdicate decisions to the court. The States have lost the ability to make law
“for the people, by the people. Quote:
|
Scalia's loosey goosey interpretation of what is in the constitution is laughable. He has a hard time understanding what precedence is and as such is a fringe member of the far right.
|
Unless you have the education Justice Scalia has, I suggest you keep your insults to yourself. Do you intend to have a serious discussion or just use this forum to bash Republicans?